Files
AstralRinth/.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/4-feature-request.yml
Alejandro González 0aa76567a6 docs(issue template): do not skip closed issues in link to existing issues (#3728)
When an issue has been already handled by our part, and thus gets
closed, but affects many users and the fix takes a while to be rolled
out, it usually happens that those who notice the matter later on don't
notice previous reports and create duplicate issues.

Let's try to improve a little bit on that by not filtering out closed
issues in the links for checking whether the same issue was already
reported before. This should make it more obvious to users who follow
the link whether an issue for their problem already exists.
2025-06-01 14:51:00 +00:00

47 lines
1.5 KiB
YAML

name: 💡 Feature Request
description: Suggest an idea
labels: [enhancement]
body:
- type: checkboxes
attributes:
label: Please confirm the following.
options:
- label: I checked the [existing issues](https://github.com/modrinth/code/issues?q=is%3Aissue) for duplicate feature requests
required: true
- label: I have checked that this feature request is not on our [roadmap](https://roadmap.modrinth.com)
required: true
- type: dropdown
id: projects
attributes:
label: What parts of Modrinth is your feature request related too?
multiple: true
options:
- App
- Website
- API
- type: textarea
attributes:
label: Is your suggested feature related to a problem? Please describe.
description: A clear and concise description of what the problem is. Ex. I'm always frustrated when [...]
validations:
required: false
- type: textarea
attributes:
label: Describe the solution you'd like
description: A clear and concise description of what you want to happen.
validations:
required: false
- type: textarea
attributes:
label: Describe alternatives you've considered
description: A clear and concise description of any alternative solutions or features you've considered.
validations:
required: false
- type: textarea
attributes:
label: Additional context
description: Add any other context or screenshots about the suggested enhancement here.
validations:
required: false